Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Feasibility and reproducibility of semi-automated longitudinal strain analysis: a comparative study with conventional manual strain analysis

Original Submission
14 Sep 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
11 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ying-ying Liu
30 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ying-ying Liu
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ying-ying Liu
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ying-ying Liu
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ying-ying Liu
Resubmission - Version 5
25 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ying-ying Liu
Resubmission - Version 6
28 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
8 Jun 2023 Author responded Author comments - Ying-ying Liu
Resubmission - Version 7
8 Jun 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
11 Jun 2023 Editorially accepted
19 Jul 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12947-023-00309-5

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page