Skip to main content

Table 6 Percentage of patients that presented with ONLY ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia as presenting rhythm that did or did not meet positive mortality outcomes stratified upon whether cardiac motion was visualized on point-of-care ultrasound. Cumulative statistics also included

From: Prognostic value of point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest: a systematic review

Study

Presenting Rhythm

Outcome

N

+ Outcome / + Cardiac Motion

+ Outcome / - Cardiac Motion

- Outcome / - Cardiac Motion

- Outcome / + Cardiac Motion

Kim et al. [13]

VT and VF

ROSC

1

100% (1/1)

0% (0/0)

0% (0/0)

0% (0/0)

Tomruk et al. [10]

VT and VF

ROSC

8

0% (0/0)

50% (4/8)

50% (4/8)

0% (0/0)

Blaivas et al. [14]

VF

Hospital Admission

66

53% (8/15)

0% (0/51)

100% (51/51)

47% (7/15)

Salen et al. [6]

VF

Hospital Admission

6

25% (1/4)

0% (0/2)

100% (2/2)

75% (3/4)

VT

Hospital Admission

5

67% (2/3)

0% (0/2)

100% (2/2)

33% (1/3)

Aichinger et al. [11]

VT and VF

Hospital Admission

9

66% (2/3)

0% (0/6)

100% (6/6)

33.3% (1/3)

Cebicci et al. [8]

VT and VF

24 h survival

45

85.7% (30/35)

20% (2/10)

80% (8/10)

14.3% (5/35)

TOTAL

  

140

72.1% (44/61)

7.6% (6/79)

92.4% (73/79)

27.9% (17/61)