Skip to main content

Table 3 Method comparison of imaging modalities in the heart failure cohort

From: Evaluation of a commercial multi-dimensional echocardiography technique for ventricular volumetry in small animals

Method

1DE

2DE

3DE

 

SHAM

TAC

SHAM

TAC

SHAM

TAC

ESV, μl

33.15 ± 4.3

55.72 ± 7.6*

34.63 ± 4.4

58.4 ± 8.6*

26.95 ± 2.6

41.57 ± 3.7**

EDV, μl

70.01 ± 4.2

85.53 ± 5.5

65.24 ± 5.2

83.54 ± 6.8

48.84 ± 2.1

58.31 ± 3.2*

EF, %

53.85 ± 3.4

36.89 ± 4.8*

47.96 ± 3.0

32.4 ± 4.1*

45.29 ± 3.8

28.9 ± 4.1*

SV, μl

36.87 ± 1.0

29.8 ± 3.5

30.62 ± 1.6

25.2 ± 2.5

21.89 ± 1.6

16.7 ± 2.6

  1. Mean ± SEM. Student’s t-test. *p <.05. **p <.01. SHAM: n = 7, TAC: n = 9. EDV = end-diastolic volume; ESV = end-systolic volume; EF = ejection fraction; SV = stroke volume