Skip to main content

Table 5 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive predictive value, negative predictive value, diagnostic accuracy in monoparametric and multiparametric analyses for reverse remodeling induced by cardiac resynchronization therapy

From: Pilot study using 3D–longitudinal strain computation in a multi-parametric approach for best selecting responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy

 

Sensitivity

Specificity

Positive predictive value

Negative predictive value

Diagnostic accuracy

septal flash

79%

79%

90%

61%

0.79

SDI L,peak > 1.037%.s−1

70.6%

7.6%

88.9%

52.4%

0.73

SDI L,peak > 1.037%.s−1 S Septal Flash

55.9%

92.9%

95%

46.4%

0.67

SDI L,peak > 1.037%.s−1 + AV

29.4%

92.9%

90.9%

35.1%

0.48

SDI L,peak > 1.037%.s−1 + IV

67.6%

92.9%

95.8%

54.2%

0.75

SDI L,peak > 1.037%.s−1 + AV + IV

29.4%

92.9%

90.9%

35.1%

0.48

SDI L,peak > 1.037%.s−1 + AV + IV + Septal Flash

23.5%

100%

100%

35%

0.46

  1. AV atrioventricular dyssynchrony, IV interventricular dyssynchrony, SDI L,peak standard deviation of the integrals of strain signals