Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients

From: Pilot study using 3D–longitudinal strain computation in a multi-parametric approach for best selecting responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy

 

All patients (n = 48)

CRT responders (n = 34, 71%)

CRT non-responders (n = 14, 29%)

P value

Age (years)

65 ± 10

64 ± 10

65 ± 11

0.893

Male, n (%)

30 (63%)

18 (53%)

12(86%)

0.033*

Ischemic etiology, n (%)

15(31%)

8 (24%)

7 (50%)

0.094

Heart rate (bpm)

69 ± 12

68 ± 12

71 ± 11

0.489

QRS duration (ms)

160 [160; 170]

160 [160; 170]

160 [153; 170]

0.649

QRS & 150 ms, n (%)

40 (83%)

29 (85%)

11 (79%)

0.676

LBBB morphology, n (%)

38 (79%)

27 (79%)

11 (79%)

1

ACE inhibitors or AR blockers, n (%)

46 (96%)

33 (97%)

13(93%)

0.503

β-blockers, n (%)

46 (96%)

33 (97%)

13(93%)

0.503

Diuretics, n (%)

28 (58%)

16 (47%)

12(86%)

0.014*

Antialdosterone, n (%)

18(38%)

14(41%)

4 (29%)

0.412

LVEF (%)

26 ± 6

28 ± 5

23 ± 5

0.002*

LVEDV (ml)

225 ± 85

209 ± 78

265 ± 89

0.037*

LVESV (ml)

169 ± 68

152 ± 57

207 ± 78

0.009*

Mitral regurgitation grade lll-IV, n (%)

10(21%)

7(21%)

3(21%)

0.0767

TAPSE (mm)

21 + 4

21 ± 4

20 ± 5

0.78

GLS (%)

− 8.9 ± 3.6

− 9.8 ± 3.4

− 6.5 ± 3.1

0.003*

  1. Data are presented as n (%), mean ± SD, median [IQR]. ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, AR angiotensin receptor, GLS global longitudinal strain, LVEDV left ventricular end-diastolic volume, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVESV left ventricular end-systolic volume, TAPSE tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion. * P value <0,05