Skip to main content

Table 3 Spearman rank correlations between vascular measurements

From: Feasibility and relevance of compound strain imaging in non-stenotic arteries: comparison between individuals with cardiovascular diseases and healthy controls

 

RS

CS

DC

cPWV

IMT

 

RS

 

-0.72**

0.28

−0.34*

-0.05

CON

-0.75**

0.23

−0.26

-0.15

CVD

CS

-0.73**

 

−0.34*

0.42*

0.07

CON

-0.24

0.04

0.24

CVD

DC

0.27*

−0.32**

 

-0.26

0.14

CON

-0.30

−0.17

CVD

cPWV

−0.25*

0.24*

−0.28*

 

0.28

CON

-0.38*

CVD

IMT

-0.08

0.19

0.01

0.01

 

|

  1. RS radial strain, CS circumferential strain, DC distensibility coefficient, CON controls, CVD patients with history of cardiovascular disease
  2. *P < 0.05 **P < 0.01; numbers in bold remain statistical significant after correcting for multiple testing with the Holm-Bonferroni method [9]